You are viewing an old revision of this page, saved 2008-02-21 04:47 by CBD. View current version · Revision history

Toontown

Last touched 2009-07-17 08:18 · View history

Bullets

I like it Squiddy, But I dont really like the Sell hq one and Law hq one. I am thinking of haveing them the logo's (Sell hq have the sellbot logo, Cash have the Cashbot logo.....) The other ones look really great. Kit T. Kat

I removed the above part because it was kind of... unnecessary? (bad word, sorry, can't think of the right one). As far as the HQs go... I was stealing the symbols from somewhere in the HQs themselves, that's why the Sell and Cash ones aren't just the standard symbols themselves. I definitely think, looking at the one I had for Law HQ, that we need something new for at least Law. I dunno. :P CBD

I dont think Law and Boss have symbols. I do think it might look good to see like, A fish logo for the Fish area, a Gear for the Cog area. The book for the sticker (i call it that, because i always misspell its real name) book. Kit T. Kat

We did have that at one point in time, but it made the page look excessively... busy. Each picture I took from the game resized in a slightly different manner, and it just became this gross hodge-podge of images for those sections. I'd like to find a general Toontown Bullet that isn't just an orange blob. It's not that I don't like the "blob", I just think there's a better option out there that we haven't come across yet. :] --CBD 13:39, 20 February 2008 (CST)

What about something like a toon's face? I have Kit's face scaled down and edited to just his face. Kit T. Kat

Hey, CBD, I was looking at the TT page and it looks like you resized the acorn bullet. I don't see what was wrong with it, and you said you were resizing it to the "standard size", but it looked a lot better before. Now it looks really stretched, in a bad way. Since I made the bullet, would you like me to send you the original? I can even resize it to the size of your choice, but still retaining the original proportions of the image. -Squiddy22

If you noticed, all the bullets are the same width, the only problem was that I didn't have PS reinstalled at the time of that resize... I know where to get the acorn, I just have to redo it real quick. Blame Paint.

Kit T., that's actually a wonderful idea. I think it might be ever better if maybe we can take Flippy's face? I don't know, maybe some random toon we all know (just not Lil' Oldman!) --CBD 21:47, 20 February 2008 (CST)

CBD, I'd be more than happy to resize them for you. If you want to do it yourself, download GIMP and read my GIMP guide on TTC. But for now, you can just let me know what you want the width or height to be of the acorn. It only takes 30 seconds for me to do it. -Squiddy22 :-)

Whoops, we both went to edit this at the same time. XD

It would be MUCH appreciate if it really is that easy to access, the only thing that matters is that the background is white (which is what you had, but it can be a little jerk to try to change that. XD), and that the width is 20 pixels (most things that resize images should keep it proportional to the height so it doesn't look all funky). Thanks! --CBD 22:47, 20 February 2008 (CST)

Nomenclature/General Discussion

Do we want the Cog HQ articles to all follow the same pattern? If you don't understand what I mean, it would basically consist of changing the article names - instead of "The V.P.", the article would be called "Sellbot Senior V.P.", "The Chief Justice" would be "Lawbot Chief Justice", etc?

I'm just asking all this stuff because I don't want to be accused of over complicating things. I know that several people I have talked to a while ago have said the images/the amounts of them are fine when I was debating not doing them at all so that the content could just be done quickly, but it's been brought to my attention that some people think its a bit much? This would be a lot easier if we had more people in here, but as of right now it's just basically me, Squiddy, Garfieldo, and some others users who come and go, running around leaving discussion and hoping that people read it/take the time to respond to it; and if I'm not here it seems like the progress that's made is piddly at the least. I really, honestly don't mean to sound self-righteous, but I need to know where to draw the line, and it's kind of hard to do so without more honest input. :/

--CBD 22:47, 20 February 2008 (CST)